Project Carryall: The Time the Santa Fe Railway Almost Detonated a Nuclear Bomb

Save 15 Miles or More Off Your Railroad Mileage By Switching to Nuclear!

If you think the words "nuclear" and "railroad" shouldn't exist in the same sentence, you're probably not the Atchison Topeka & Santa Fe Railway in the early 1960's.

When we think of nuclear bombs, we typically associate them as weapons, since the vast majority are used in military circles, but with the nuclear age came the potential to use these weapons not as deterrence or the annihilation of humanity, but rather construction projects. 

Just one year removed from the Cuban Missile Crisis, in 1963 the AT&SF wanted to harbor this technology to re-align their railroad near Ludlow, CA, as well as Route 66 and the brand new Interstate 40, and save about 15 miles off of the mainline right-of-way.

Map of the proposed nuclear blasting and re-alignments. Public domain image via Atomic Skies

The idea was to straighten the Santa Fe mainline between Needles and Barstow, as well as reducing the grade through the mountains. Given that all the areas in between the two cities were practically ghost towns, it made sense to try to abandon the route and re-align the tracks and road to a more tangent alignment.

I've made a quick map below for clarity. The nuclear alignment should not be considered definitive, since to my knowledge a full survey of what the grade would have looked like was never completed, or at least not made public.

   


The actual grade proposed would have changed lines at Goffs in the East and Ash Hill in the West. This would have saved about 50 minutes in transport time for a typical freight train along the route. The State of California would also use the newly-blasted route for an alignment of I-40, saving about 10 miles off of the existing alignment.



Project Carryall - the name of this proposal, was an offshoot of the larger Project Plowshare, which studied the use of nuclear weapons for peaceful purposes, namely massive construction projects. 

The AT&SF contacted the Atomic Energy Commission to study the feasibility of using nuclear bombs in place of conventional blasting to literally move mountains - as the cost of nuclear bombs was only somewhat more cost effective in comparison to the amount of conventional bombing that would have been required to excavate and tunnel the area, and would take a comparatively small amount of time. You can read the feasibility study of the project here.

While the project was never completed, tests using small scale nuclear bombs the subject matter bears a historical marker in Ludlow, CA.

Ludlow, CA Project Carryall Historical Marker. Image by Michael Kindig, 2010, via HMDB

The marker reads, "With the end of World War II and the onset of the Cold War, America embarked on an ambitious program to ensure the nation's preeminence in the nuclear arms race. To this end Edward Teller and the Atomic Energy Commission detonated hundreds of nuclear devices underwater, underground, and in the atmosphere. Weapons development remained paramount, but the AEC also held a mandate to develop peaceful uses for atomic power. In 1957 California's Lawrence Livermore Laboratory launched an experimental program called Operation Plowshare to use nuclear energy for such applications as power plants, medicine, mining, the extraction of oil and natural gas, and for the excavation of canals, harbors and roadways. Under Plowshare, a 1963 feasibility study was conducted for Project Carryall, a plan to realign the Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railroad and provide a route for Interstate 40. 23 nuclear explosions totaling 1.8 Megatons were to be used to excavate 1 2-mile cut up to 350 feet deep through the Bristol Mountains east of Ludlow and remove 60 million cubic yards of rock. Despite many assurances of safety from the AEC, obvious environmental and health concerns over this and other Plowshare projects caused several postponements, and in 1968 the project was dropped completely. 28 nuclear tests were conducted under operation Plowshare before its termination in 1975."

As Carryall was just one of many atomic projects under the Plowshare umbrella, the Santa Fe decided to wait on the results from some of the other projects before going forward with Carryall. The results they found failed to live up to economic expectations, as the costs and potential fallout impacts did not appear to meet the potential positives of using nuclear technology for construction. In 1966, California pulled out of the project entirely, meaning I-40 would be built using conventional methods. The Santa Fe ultimately pulled the plug on the project soon after, and the grade through Ludlow remains in place to this day.

It turned out that the general public wasn't particularly fond of nuclear weapons being detonated in their own back yards with Project Plowshare, and while we try not to endorse NIMBYism here, I can't really blame anyone for that, although there were relatively few impacts with what nuclear weapons were detonated in tests for the project. Nonetheless, by 1977, Project Plowshare and all its associated projects were cancelled.

If you'd like to read more about Project Plowshare, there's a book by Scott Kaufman, "Project Plowshare: The Peaceful Use of Nuclear Explosives in Cold War America" (Link is for Amazon and may earn the site a commission if you use it)

Thanks as always for reading!
Location: Ludlow, CA 92338, USA

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Abandoned Route 66 in McCook, IL

Image
Route 66, the iconic "Main Street of America," weaves through the heart of the United States, connecting communities and embodying the spirit of adventure. However, not all sections of this historic highway have stood the test of time. While much of the former US 66 is drivable in one way or another, especially in Illinois, there are some parts are not.  One of the first such roadblocks for would-be travelers heading from Chicago to Los Angeles via the Mother Road, now known as Joliet Road, comes just outside of Chicago in McCook, IL, where the former highway is closed between 55th St and East Ave, and has been for over two decades. (Link to the location on our Ghost Towns Map ) Image: Google Maps at 55th and Joliet Rd in McCook, IL The land that the quarry would eventually take over was part of Stinson Airport in the early days of Route 66, dating back to before 1930. ( Abandoned Airports map ). 1938 USGS Aerial Imagery The quarrying on the south side of the road would...
Read more

The Underwater Water Slide: Fly Over at Durinrell TikiBad

Image
Have you ever wished to experience being transferred from one pool of liquid to another via a pipe? Had you visited the Dutch water park known as Durinrell , also known as Tikibad before 2010, you would have had the chance. Half water slide, half war crime, this was a unique water slide that was filled to the brim with water, leaving riders completely submerged throughout the journey. Image:  XtremeRidesNL Known as the Fly Over was an underwater water slide, which is exactly how it sounds, and transported riders from one pool to another using the water as propulsion. Built in 1994, riders dove underwater to access the slide, using gravity to transport them upwards via the Communicating Vessels Principle . Riders would be completely underwater for about 15-20 seconds. This is how I imagine those 15-20 seconds felt like while riding the slide. The slide was built to drain water in five seconds or less in case a rider got stuck in the slide or had a medical emergency, but the threat...
Read more

Railroad Vocabulary: A List of Words and Phrases Used in the Industry - Updated February 2024

Image
As somebody who enjoyed watching trains, but was not an employee of the railroad industry ( at least growing up ), when I would interact with railfans and historians, there was often a lot of technical jargon that applied only to the railroad industry thrown back and forth that made it difficult for a newcomer to understand what they were talking about. For example, what is a dinky? It's actually a passenger train. This non-inclusive language seems to keep the loop closed to members of the community, and to uncouple (no pun intended) that technical jargon and help make it easier for people to communicate with people in the industry, I am creating a list of railroad vocabulary that I'm hoping will make the industry more transparent.  BNSF 2361 . Image: Matt Flores While I ultimately believe that such technical jargon has no place outside of perhaps technical communications between employees, I know quite well that I alone am not going to stop people from communicating in a non-i...
Read more